yes, Let’s do this! 
2 Likes
agree with you lets do this !
1 Like
done yes very good thanks for vote
1 Like
I feel really enthusisatic about the project. Wish the team my sincere success.
1 Like
Great！The lovely behavior of the team. This is very encouraging. I like it!
1 Like
Let’s do this! Make the best project!
1 Like
let’s do this ！but I need spend time, and update your profile. Earn badges etc…?
1 Like
Okay. 10 minutes
I will do as your guide.
2 Likes
Totally agree, let it happen
1 Like
So much for this,I like it
1 Like
distributon is accurate trading tournament was long than one time testing traders needed to be active and make profits to be in top 10 it was not easy like only testing platform
1 Like
lfg great project
testnet was smooth & battle royale too
#zksync #incr
1 Like
Totally agree with you 
2 Likes
I would argue with that, firstly not everyone is a trader, I myself am a Developer and s scientific researcher therefor I love testing stuff but I won’t fit in a trading competition so I won’t go for it, second is that people who hardly traded at the battle royale event has a good reason for that, 1000 USDC in rewards, I would say you’re right if they were doing rapid test voluntarily for a long time but that wasn’t the case, there was a prize, people competed over it and some of them made it to the top and already got their prize, I remember we had some quiz events, I even reached 1st place in one of those, doesn’t that mean that I’m an active community member and deserve more? imo no! cause I’ve already got my reward, a 1 month discord nitro subscription and everyone else didn’t get anything though they were actively participating in a community event so tell me what’s the difference with the battle royale? both were community events, people competed for prizes and some people end up winning the prize and most didn’t. Who’s to say that a v1 or v2 tester has only tried the platform once and not for the entire runtime, If that’s the criteria we’re looking for and we really want it to be fairdrop then we possibly should go for an on-chain tx analysis to see who contributed more, under what circumstances.
With all that said, I didn’t suggest reducing a large amount of your portion, just a tiny bit to appreciate those who participate in governance, isn’t that what it’s all for after all?
@luie I bring this up again since there’s such low activity on voting here, let’s give this 65 voters some extra tokens for their participation in governance (Exclude me so that everyone assures I’m not thinking about personal benefits) and I’m sure we will see the flow of people here for the next proposal voting.
4 Likes
battle royale rules already posted in discord only top going to win,this platform created for trading not testing. more than thounsand people got same amount to trade there was equal opportunity for everyone.
distribution is accurate
beta v1 testers got 47,3% of total allocation beta v2 got 37% so 84% is allocated for beta testers
if they want to allocate to voters it is better to reduce beta v1 47.3% to 40% OR there is no need to distrubute to voters because anyone can create multiple accounts and vote for rewards
2 Likes
As you have mentioned, there was a battle royale event with specific rules and rewards for Top 3, everyone participated knowing that and if they ended up on Top 3 they got their reward! now this token allocation is an extra reward and it’s good and thoughtful of team but the allocation is way too much!
The platform is a trading platform, yes BUT this is a trading platform on testnet, what matters and brings value is testing the platform not the large volumes you make while trading with your priceless tokens on testnet. I’m not saying that everyone but most of the people who participated in this were most likely trading to get in Top 3 and catch the rewards, most of them didn’t even bother to feel in some feedback forms.
I checked the spreadsheet again and I saw that the reward for other events participants is way lower than this, 70 tokens for trivia winners and 65 for meme makers, then why should this event be an exception? even the global angels who are basically moderators that work 24/7 on server are getting 105 extra tokens not 190!
Now I see that you may try hard to protect your allocation and not lose a penny of it, but nobody can deny the fact that battle royale rewards are too much. anyways we have discussed this before with Luie so I don’t know why this has been brought up again,
YES there is a need to appreciate voters else we end up with no DAO, everyone would just dump their tokens at the TGE! this is not the first time I have suggested this and so far 9 days have passed and I haven’t seen hunters attacking this voting so far! even if they did, it’s really easy to filter users who have joined before a specific date or ask users to bind their discords!
2 Likes
read proposal again distribution is accurate there are two more rounds coming for community there will be more meme events or any other community events will happen in future.2M is allocated
battle royale have official rewards announced everyone was equal level to win
84% was allocated to beta testers
testing is not going to happen in next rounds only active community can participate
so allocation accurate
it is better to give rewards for dao voters from betav1 47% they got most allocation OR they can give them from next round
1 Like
There is no need to read the proposal once more as I’ve read it multiple times already. This proposal draft is sent here for us to discuss and that’s what I’m doing. You either don’t get it what I’m talking about or don’t want to hear it cause it doesn’t match your benefits!
I think a lot of people are gonna dump this in the first seconds of launch therefor I suggest putting a vesting schedule on airdrop just to make sure those lucky people who got way more allocation than deserved won’t dump this so hard.
1 Like
yes i think so,thank u
1 Like
nice this proposal is very good
1 Like